From Israel's standpoint, the airstrikes on Iranian military sites are a necessary and proportionate response to ongoing missile threats. Israeli officials justify the strikes as a protective measure aimed at neutralizing missile production facilities, air defenses, and UAV sites in Iran to prevent future attacks. Israel asserts that it carefully targeted only military locations to avoid civilian casualties, framing the action as essential for its security and a response to the increased aggression from Iran and its proxies in the region.

Iran interprets the airstrikes as an aggressive act by Israel, infringing upon Iran's sovereignty and provoking further instability in an already tense region. Iranian leaders condemn the operation, viewing it as an illegal and disproportionate violation that disregards international norms. Iranian officials emphasize their country’s right to defend itself against such provocations and imply that Israel’s strategy not only threatens Iran but is also part of a broader pattern of escalation aimed at destabilizing the region.

The international community, particularly the United States, calls for restraint from both Israel and Iran, aiming to avoid a wider regional conflict. U.S. officials advocate for Israel’s response to remain targeted and proportional to reduce civilian impact, acknowledging Israel’s security concerns while urging Iran not to retaliate. The U.S. and allied nations are wary of escalating tensions as this could lead to destabilization across the Middle East, with fears that continuous exchanges of force might spiral into a full-scale regional war.